2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Allan Rodgers v. Daniel Knight.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allan Rodgers v. Daniel Knight Anchor | green | “any time a litigant has been critical of a judge would create perverse incentives and enable judge shopping.” | 3 |
| 2 | Matthew Akins v. Daniel Knight | green | “any time a litigant has been critical of a judge would create perverse incentives and enable judge shopping.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.