2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Heers v. Parsons (In Re Heers).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heers v. Parsons (In Re Heers) Anchor | green | “the records in these appeals reflect a pervasive and unjustified series of breaches of fiduciary duties by debtor.” | 3 |
| 2 | Estate of Cora v. Jahrling (In Re Jahrling) | green | “applying the correct subjective standard,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.