2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from American Express Bank, FSB v. Scali.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Express Bank, FSB v. Scali Anchor | green | “must tender sufficient evidence that there was a credit card agreement, which the defendant accepted by using the credit card and making payments thereon, and that the agreement was breached by the defendant when he failed to make required payments” | 3 |
| 2 | Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. v. Tsoukas | green | “detailed and specific contradiction of the allegations in the process server's affidavit sufficient to create a question of fact on this issue” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.