2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Said Hassen v. Government of the Virgin Islan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Said Hassen v. Government of the Virgin Islan Anchor | green | “review is plenary, we may affirm on any ground supported by the record.” | 3 |
| 2 | Victoria Druding v. Care Alternatives | green | “the plain language of the fca denotes scienter as an element independent of falsity” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.