2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United Food & Commercial Workers Unions v. Warner Chilcott Ltd. (In Re Asacol Antitrust Litig.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Food & Commercial Workers Unions v. Warner Chilcott Ltd. (In Re Asacol Antitrust Litig.) Anchor | green | “test whether any dissimilarity among the claims of class members can be dealt with in a manner that is not 'inefficient or unfair.” | 4 |
| 2 | Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley v. ACT, Inc. | green | “in deciding whether individual issues predominate over common questions, a court must not rely on mere speculation that individual issues may arise.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.