2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 72 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lorenzo Pledger v. Loretta Lynch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lorenzo Pledger v. Loretta Lynch Anchor | green | “sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 38 |
| 2 | Roman Zak v. Chelsea Therapeutics International | green | “when the document is integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint, and when the plaintiffs do not challenge the document's authenticity.” | 34 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.