Topic: parol evidence is inadmissible to contradict or explain a w… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #46517

2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Egleston v. Knickerbacker.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Egleston v. Knickerbacker Anchor
nysupct · 1849
neutral “parol evidence is inadmissible to contradict or explain a written agreement.” 3
2 Tobey v. Barber
· 1809
neutral “and in full for the second and third quarters' rent.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check