2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walters v. Francisco.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walters v. Francisco Anchor | green | “significant pieces of information it needed to make the soundest possible decision” | 3 |
| 2 | Oddo v. Collins | green | “we take no position as to what the new determination should be” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.