2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Rudduck.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Rudduck Anchor | green | “defendant has made no showing that the information in the psr was inaccurate” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. James | green | “if the investigation report contains incorrect information, defendant should object at sentencing to the inclusion of the erroneous information and move to strike it” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.