5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 71 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. City of Columbia, Missouri Harold Boldt, Finance Director.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. City of Columbia, Missouri Harold Boldt, Finance Director Anchor | green | “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and give that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences.” | 21 |
| 2 | Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. | green | “useless, expensive and time-consuming trials where there is actually no genuine, factual issue remaining to be tried.” | 18 |
| 3 | Sandra BREEDING, Appellant, v. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER AND CO., Appellee | green | “inferences are often the basis of the claim ... and 'summary judgment should not be granted unless the evidence could not support any reasonable inference' of discrimination.” | 15 |
| 4 | Keith HINDMAN, Appellant, v. TRANSKRIT CORPORATION, Appellee | green | “seldom be granted ... unless all the evidence points one way and is susceptible to no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the nonmoving party.” | 10 |
| 5 | Vivian v. Madison | green | “traditionally turn to federal law for guidance on evaluating the icra, but federal law ... is not controlling.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.