2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Bayusik.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Bayusik Anchor | green | “it is axiomatic that in determining value the condition of the item must be taken into account” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Harold | green | “the market value of a stolen item is to be measured by what the thief would have had to pay had he purchased the item instead of stealing it” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.