2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re the Estate of Rothko.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re the Estate of Rothko Anchor | green | “surrogates do not usually give advance approval concerning matters of business judgment which are within the province of executors,” | 3 |
| 2 | In re the Estate of Gregory | neutral | “fiduciary act for which the fiduciary will be held accountable in the accounting proceedings” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.