2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Flora Mir Candy Corporation v. Dickson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flora Mir Candy Corporation v. Dickson Anchor | green | “is no mere instrument of procedural convenience ... but a measure vitally affecting substantive rights,” | 3 |
| 2 | Chemical Bank New York Trust Company v. Kheel | green | “interrelationships of the group” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.