9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 71 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. McFarland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. McFarland Anchor | green | “if the facts necessary to adjudicate the claimed error are not in the record on appeal, no actual prejudice is shown and the error is not manifest.” | 42 |
| 2 | State v. Afana | green | “arrested the passenger on the warrant.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Afana | green | “it is the state's burden to show that the automobile search incident to arrest exception applies” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. McCormack | green | “a new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Mierz | green | “a risk of flight or destruction of evidence.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Tibbles | green | “(1) hot pursuit; (2) fleeing suspect; (3) danger to arresting officer or to the public; (4) mobility of the vehicle; (5) mobility or destruction of the evidence.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Tibbles | green | “at best, the state has shown it was expedient for trooper larsen to conduct the search as he did” | 3 |
| 8 | State v. Tibbles | green | “to find exigent circumstances based on these bare facts would set the stage for the exigent circumstances exception to swallow the general warrant requirement.” | 3 |
| 9 | State v. Wright | green | “fishing expedition in which the police thought they might discover evidence of some unrelated crime.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.