2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hahn v. Department of Retirement Systems.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hahn v. Department of Retirement Systems Anchor | neutral | “evidence is substantial if it is of sufficient quantity to persuade a fair-minded person of the truth or correctness of the agency order.” | 3 |
| 2 | Van Sant v. City of Everett | green | “on factual questions the reviewing court cannot substitute its interpretation of the facts for the agency's interpretation or reweigh the evidence.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.