2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boles v. Autery.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boles v. Autery Anchor | green | “that a witness is present in court and testifies in the proceedings does not necessarily mean that the witness should not be joined as a party.” | 3 |
| 2 | Byrd Companies, Inc. v. Smith | green | “in cases where the final judgment will affect ownership of an interest in real property, all parties claiming an interest in the real property must be joined.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.