3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 71 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. Harmoosh.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. Harmoosh Anchor | green | “a court can grant summary judgment only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, the case presents no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party demonstrates entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.” | 35 |
| 2 | Masoud Sharif v. United Airlines, Inc. | green | “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 33 |
| 3 | Iraq Middle Market Development Foundation v. Harmoosh | green | “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.