2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wilson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson v. State Anchor | green | “victim-impact statements typically 'describe only the effect of the crime on the victim and his family' and, although relevant to the penalty-phase, are inadmissible in the guilt phase.” | 3 |
| 2 | Gissendanner v. State | green | “is any evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.