2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kukral v. Mekras.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kukral v. Mekras Anchor | green | “a complex presuit investigation procedure that both the claimant and defendant must follow before a medical negligence claim may be brought in court.” | 3 |
| 2 | Weinstock v. Groth | green | “the proper test for determining whether a defendant is entitled to notice under section 766.106(2) is whether the defendant is directly or vicariously liable under the medical negligence standard of care set forth in section 766.102(1).” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.