2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 5 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barry v. Washington Post Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barry v. Washington Post Co. Anchor | green | “to prevail on a motion for stay, a movant must show that he or she is likely to succeed on the merits, that irreparable injury will result if the stay is denied, that opposing parties will not be harmed by a stay, and that the public interest favors the granting of a stay.” | 3 |
| 2 | Doe v. Axelrod | green | “novel issues of first impression . . . a preliminary injunction should be granted to hold the parties in status quo while the legal issues are determined in a deliberate and judicious manner” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.