2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 4 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gardner v. BOARD OF POLICE COM'RS, FOR KANSAS CITY.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gardner v. BOARD OF POLICE COM'RS, FOR KANSAS CITY Anchor | green | “it was not clearly established as of september 2007 that an officer in missouri could effect a seizure under the fourth amendment without subjectively intending to do so.” | 2 |
| 2 | Henry Szabla v. City Of Brooklyn Park | green | “a submissible case of excessive force.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.