2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 4 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mattingly v. Heckler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mattingly v. Heckler Anchor | green | “those individuals who met the eligibility requirements for the state administered programs on january 1, 1972, rather than determining medicaid eligibility according to the standards of the new ssi program.” | 2 |
| 2 | Roloff v. Sullivan | green | “the supreme court has consistently characterized section 209(b) as a means whereby states can restrict medicaid coverage.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.