2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 4 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Couture.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Couture Anchor | green | “mere possession of a handgun was not sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was illegally carrying that gun” | 2 |
| 2 | Richardson v. Warden, Wade Correctional Center | green | “mere possession of a handgun was not sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was illegally carrying that gun” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.