4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 70 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Hughes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Hughes Anchor | green | “whether the evidence is sufficient to prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 34 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Hughes | green | “must view evidence in the light most favorable to the commonwealth as the verdict winner, and accept as true all evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom upon which, if believed, the fact finder properly could have based its verdict.” | 26 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. French | green | “these factors may coalesce to establish a conspiratorial agreement beyond a reasonable doubt where one factor alone might fail.” | 6 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Johnson | green | “conspiracy to commit a crime and the underlying crime itself are two entirely separate offenses with separate elements required for each.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.