2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 70 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Johnson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Johnson Anchor | green | “when determining whether two offenses are allied offenses of similar import subject to merger under r.c. 2941.25, the conduct of the accused must be considered.” | 63 |
| 2 | State v. Washington | green | “when deciding whether to merge multiple offenses at sentencing pursuant to r.c. 2941.25, a court must review the entire record, including arguments and information presented at the sentencing hearing, to determine whether the offenses were committed separately or with a separate…” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.