6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 70 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Danielson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Danielson Anchor | green | “a defendant will be given one appellate review of adverse factual findings” | 28 |
| 2 | People v. Curry | green | “must weigh conflicting testimony, review any rational inferences that may be drawn from the evidence and evaluate the strength of such conclusions” | 14 |
| 3 | People v. Curry | green | “once this court conducts such an analysis, it must then decide whether the verdict finding the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt was warranted” | 10 |
| 4 | People v. Olsen | green | “sufficiently wide, so that the factfinder may be certain beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant exceeded the permissible limit” | 8 |
| 5 | People v. Curry | green | “if a finding in favor of the defendant would not have been unreasonable, then this court 'must weigh conflicting testimony, review any rational inferences that may be drawn from the evidence and evaluate the strength of such conclusions” | 6 |
| 6 | People v. Prado | green | “any specific, relevant objections to the trial court's alleged bias” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.