7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 69 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer Anchor | green | “are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts should be resolved in favor of remand.” | 26 |
| 2 | James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer | green | “the removal statutes 'are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts should be resolved in favor of remand.” | 21 |
| 3 | Yellen v. Teledne Continental Motors, Inc. | green | “evidence outside the pleadings, including such supporting documents as affidavits and deposition transcripts.” | 7 |
| 4 | Costa v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc. | green | “subject matter jurisdiction is lacking.” | 6 |
| 5 | Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Chimet, S.P.A. | green | “a plaintiff's choice of forum should rarely be disturbed.” | 3 |
| 6 | Nobers v. Crucible, Inc. | green | “there is a difference between curing a jurisdictional defect and creating federal jurisdiction in the first instance.” | 3 |
| 7 | Hampton v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. | green | “these cases have not enjoyed broad support.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.