Topic: any allegation of ineffectiveness must be firmly founded in… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #4865

8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 69 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McFarland v. State.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 McFarland v. State Anchor
texcrimapp · 1996
green “any allegation of ineffectiveness must be firmly founded in the record and the record must affirmatively demonstrate the alleged ineffectiveness.” 23
2 Menefee v. State
texcrimapp · 2009
green “no trial court is authorized to render a conviction in a felony case, consistent with article 1.15, based upon a plea of guilty 'without sufficient evidence to support the same.” 14
3 Ex Parte Morrow
texcrimapp · 1997
green “(1) whether counsel's advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases and if not, (2) whether there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” 10
4 Ex Parte Williams
texcrimapp · 1986
green “an additional procedural safeguard required by the state of texas but not by federal constitutional law.” 8
5 Ivey v. State
texcrimapp · 2009
green “in the best interest of justice, the public, and the defendant” 5
6 Phillips v. State
texcrimapp · 1990
green “neither the child's awareness of the perpetrator's presence and/or the witnessing of the perpetrators anus or any part of the person's genitalia is a required element of the charge.” 3
7 Webb v. State
texapp · 2005
green “the error may have had a 'substantial influence' on the outcome of the proceeding.” 3
8 Spradling v. State
texcrimapp · 1989
green “there are two victims, a separate victim for each offense, the acts, though occurring at the same time and place, constitute separate offenses involving separate issues of law, and separate prosecutions are not barred by former jeopardy.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check