Topic: (1) a legally protected privacy interest; (2) a reasonable … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #4873

9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 69 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. Anchor
cal · 1994
green “(1) a legally protected privacy interest; (2) a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances; and (3) conduct by defendant constituting a serious invasion of privacy.” 18
2 Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.
cal · 1994
green “actionable invasions of privacy must be sufficiently serious in their nature, scope, and actual or potential impact to constitute an egregious breach of the social norms underlying the privacy right.” 18
3 Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.
cal · 1994
green “a plaintiff alleging an invasion of privacy in violation of the state constitutional right to privacy must establish each of the following: (1) a legally protected privacy interest; (2) a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances; and (3) conduct by defendant consti…” 10
4 Rains v. Belshe
calctapp · 1995
green “a drug used to control behavior and used in a manner not required to treat the patient's medical symptoms” 4
5 Rains v. Belshe
calctapp · 1995
green “applies only to the relatively nonintrusive and routine, ongoing medical intervention.” 4
6 Conservatorship of Wendland
cal · 2001
green “starvation, dehydration, and death.” 4
7 Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
cal · 1960
green “the power of a court to declare a statute unconstitutional is an ultimate power; its use should be avoided if a reasonable statutory construction makes the use unnecessary.” 4
8 People v. Petty
calctapp · 2013
green “in recognition of the dignity and privacy a person has a right to expect, the law recognizes that an adult has the fundamental right to control the decisions relating to his or her own health care, including the decision to have life-sustaining treatment withheld or withdrawn.” 4
9 Kremen v. Cohen
ca9 · 2003
green “ownership or right to possession of property, wrongful disposition of the property right and damages.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check