9 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 69 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATES.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATES Anchor | green | “that neither party shall do anything that will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.” | 22 |
| 2 | Warner Insurance v. Commissioner of Insurance | green | “every contract implies good faith and fair dealing between the parties to it.” | 17 |
| 3 | Druker v. Roland Wm. Jutras Associates, Inc. | green | “neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.” | 6 |
| 4 | Uno Restaurants, Inc. v. Boston Kenmore Realty Corp. | green | “the duty of good faith and fair dealing concerns the manner of performance.” | 6 |
| 5 | Druker v. Roland Wm. Jutras Associates, Inc. | green | “that neither party shall do anything that will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.” | 5 |
| 6 | Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Millis Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. | green | “carries an implication of a dishonest purpose, conscious doing of wrong, or breach of a duty through motive of self-interest or ill will.” | 5 |
| 7 | Druker v. Roland Wm. Jutras Associates, Inc. | green | “have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.” | 3 |
| 8 | Robert and Ardis James Foundation v. Meyers | green | “every contract in massachusetts is subject to an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.” | 3 |
| 9 | National Merchandising Corp. v. Leyden | green | “an element of uncertainty in the assessment of damages is not a bar to their recovery” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.