5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 69 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Homan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Homan Anchor | red | “must be drawn in favor of the state and interpreted most strongly against the defendant.” | 27 |
| 2 | State v. Drum | green | “in claiming insufficient evidence, the defendant necessarily admits the truth of the state's evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from it.” | 18 |
| 3 | State v. Thompson | green | “not proper matters for the statement of additional grounds under rap 10.10(a).” | 10 |
| 4 | State v. Engel | green | “substantial evidence' is evidence sufficient to persuade a fair-minded person of the truth of the asserted premise.” | 7 |
| 5 | State v. Drum | green | “the defendant necessarily admits the truth of the state's evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from it.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.