2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 69 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barry v. Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barry v. Colvin Anchor | green | “the extent to which the claimant's alleged functional limitations and restrictions due to pain or other symptoms can reasonably be accepted as consistent with the objective medical evidence and other evidence to decide how the claimant's symptoms affect her ability to work.” | 38 |
| 2 | Rousey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. | green | “remand is not required where 'the evidence of record allows the court to glean the rationale of an alj's decision.” | 31 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.