4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 68 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co. Anchor | green | “mere litigation expense, even substantial and unrecoupable cost, does not constitute irreparable injury.” | 46 |
| 2 | David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr. | green | “the party who seeks a stay bears the burden of establishing these prerequisites.” | 8 |
| 3 | Lorita Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. | green | “protect, develop, and, where feasible, restore or enhance the resources of the state's coastal zone” | 7 |
| 4 | James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated | green | “to consider whether federal-officer jurisdiction exists under latiolais v. huntington ingalls, inc., 951 f.3d 286 (5th cir. 2020).” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.