5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 999 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Schulman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Schulman Anchor | green | “in texas, an anders brief need not specifically advance 'arguable' points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities.” | 372 |
| 2 | Bledsoe v. State | green | “due to the nature of anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion that it considered the issues raised in the briefs and reviewed the record for reversible error but found none, the court of appeals met the requirement of texas rule of appellate procedure 47.1.” | 326 |
| 3 | In Re Schulman | green | “in texas, an anders brief need not specifically advance arguable points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities.” | 12 |
| 4 | Tapia, Gilbert Jr. | green | “a plea of true, standing alone, is sufficient to support the revocation of community supervision and adjudicate guilt.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.