6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 67 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet Metal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet Metal Anchor | green | “the purpose of sebs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” | 20 |
| 2 | Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co. | green | “this analysis is necessarily a facts and circumstances one in which the court is mindful of the jurisprudential tenet that workers' compensation is to be liberally construed in favor of coverage.” | 15 |
| 3 | Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co. | green | “in determining if an injured employee has made out a prima facie case of entitlement to sebs, the trial court may and should take into account all those factors which might bear on an employee's ability to earn a wage.” | 10 |
| 4 | Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. | green | “in determining whether a wcj's finding that an employee has met his initial burden of proving entitlement to sebs is manifestly erroneous, a reviewing court must examine all evidence that bears upon the employee's inability to earn 90 or more of his pre-injury wages.” | 7 |
| 5 | Poissenot v. St. Bernard Parish Sheriff's Office | green | “the purpose of sebs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.