6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 67 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Saavedra-Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saavedra-Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Anchor | green | “this court will affirm a district court's order if the district court reached the correct result, even if for the wrong reason.” | 38 |
| 2 | Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las Vegas | green | “only if it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff could prove no set of facts, which, if true, would entitle the plaintiff to relief.” | 17 |
| 3 | Saavedra-Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | green | “if the district court reached the correct result, even if for the wrong reason” | 4 |
| 4 | Vaile v. Porsboll | green | “creates a single-order system for child support orders, which is designed so that only one state's support order is effective at any given time.” | 3 |
| 5 | Vaile v. Porsboll | green | “on remand, the district court must determine whether such an order exists and assess its bearing, if any, on the district court's enforcement of the nevada support order.” | 3 |
| 6 | Saavedra-Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | green | “this court will affirm a district supreme court of nevada (0) 7a q-i ci li c1 i th -- " t'sh "tit in, court's order if the district court reached the correct result, even if for the wrong reason.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.