4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 407 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Charles Judd.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Charles Judd Anchor | green | “might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.” | 131 |
| 2 | Chung Shin v. Shalala | green | “party cannot create a genuine dispute of material fact through mere speculation or compilation of inferences.” | 128 |
| 3 | Foster v. University of Maryland-Eastern Shore | green | “must not weigh evidence or make credibility determinations.” | 117 |
| 4 | Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Charles Judd | green | “a dispute is genuine if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party. . . . and a fact is material if it might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.” | 31 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.