4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 407 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Henkel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Henkel Anchor | green | “in the light most favorable to the prevailing party at the pcra level.” | 182 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Daniels | green | “a failure to satisfy any prong of the ineffectiveness test requires rejection of the claim of ineffectiveness.” | 122 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Ervin | green | “so unreasonable that no competent lawyer would have chosen it.” | 73 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Daniels | green | “failure to satisfy any prong of the ineffectiveness test requires rejection of the claim of ineffectiveness.” | 30 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.