6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Astro-Med, Inc. v. Nihon Kohden America, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Astro-Med, Inc. v. Nihon Kohden America, Inc. Anchor | green | “become part of the mix only to the extent that they are uncontradicted.” | 16 |
| 2 | A Corp. v. All American Plumbing, Inc. | green | “properly documented evidentiary proffers as true and construes them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff's jurisdictional claim.” | 16 |
| 3 | Vapotherm, Inc. v. Santiago | green | “must determine whether the defendant's contacts with the state satisfy both the state's long-arm statute as well as the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.” | 11 |
| 4 | Platten v. HG Bermuda Exempted Ltd. | green | “rather, the plaintiff must put forward 'evidence of specific facts' to demonstrate that jurisdiction exists.” | 9 |
| 5 | Platten v. HG Bermuda Exempted Ltd. | green | “must put forward 'evidence of specific facts' to demonstrate that jurisdiction exists.” | 7 |
| 6 | Phillips v. Prairie Eye Center | green | “rely on unsupported allegations in its pleadings.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.