5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio Corporation Anchor | green | “the possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency's finding from being supported by substantial evidence.” | 21 |
| 2 | Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. v. United States | green | “the record as a whole, including evidence that supports as well as evidence that 'fairly detracts from the substantiality of the evidence.” | 18 |
| 3 | Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. v. United States | green | “by considering the record as a whole, including evidence that supports as well as evidence that 'fairly detracts from the substantiality of the evidence.” | 16 |
| 4 | Cleo Inc. v. United States | green | “the substantial evidence test does not require that there be an absence of evidence detracting from the agency's conclusion, nor is there an absence of substantial evidence simply because the reviewing court would have reached a different conclusion based on the same record.” | 8 |
| 5 | Suramerica De Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United States | green | “weigh the wisdom of, or to resolve any struggle between, competing views of the policy interest, but rather to respect legitimate policy choices made by the agency in interpreting and applying the statute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.