Topic: evidence of knowledge and acquiescence. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #5091

6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Beck v. City of Pittsburgh.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Robert Beck v. City of Pittsburgh Anchor
ca3 · 1996
green “evidence of knowledge and acquiescence.” 13
2 Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District
scotus · 1998
green “an 'appropriate person' ... is, at minimum, an official of the recipient entity with authority to take corrective action to end the discrimination.” 12
3 Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587
ca3 · 1991
green “deliberately chose not to pursue these alternatives or acquiesced in a longstanding policy or custom of inaction in this regard.” 11
4 Warren v. Reading School District
ca3 · 2002
green “a school principal who is entrusted with the responsibility and authority normally associated with that position will ordinarily be an 'appropriate person' under title ix.” 11
5 Mann v. Palmerton Area School District
pamd · 2014
green “municipal liability only attaches when a plaintiff demonstrates that an official policy or custom caused the asserted constitutional deprivation.” 10
6 Carter v. City of Philadelphia
ca3 · 1999
green “additionally, if the policy at issue relates to a failure to train or supervise municipal employees, "liability under section 1983 requires a showing that the failure amounts to 'deliberate indifference' to the rights of persons with whom those employees will come into contact.” 9

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check