3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. Stack.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. Stack Anchor | green | “dismissal with prejudice and without leave to amend is not appropriate unless it is clear on de novo review that the complaint could not be saved by amendment.” | 42 |
| 2 | Johnson v. Buckley | green | “futility alone can justify the denial of a motion to amend.” | 20 |
| 3 | National Council of La Raza v. Barbara Cegavske | green | “in the absence of any apparent or declared reason - such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment,…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.