5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 65 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Powell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Powell Anchor | green | “review the entire record, weigh the evidence, consider the credibility of the witnesses, and determine whether the trier of fact clearly lost its way and created a manifest miscarriage of justice.” | 22 |
| 2 | State v. Sipple | green | “exceptional cases in which the evidence weighs heavily against the conviction.” | 17 |
| 3 | State v. Walker (Slip Opinion) | green | “after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 14 |
| 4 | State v. Walker (Slip Opinion) | green | “the relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 6 |
| 5 | State v. Jones (Slip Opinion) | green | “asks whether the evidence against a defendant, if believed, supports the conviction.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.