6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Science Spectrum, Inc. v. Martinez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Science Spectrum, Inc. v. Martinez Anchor | green | “a motion for summary judgment must itself expressly present the grounds upon which it is made, and must stand or fall on these grounds alone.” | 31 |
| 2 | Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez | green | “a product may be unreasonably dangerous because of a defect in manufacturing, design, or marketing.” | 8 |
| 3 | Brandt v. Surber | green | “differing conclusions as to the underlying factual situation.” | 8 |
| 4 | Hernandez Ex Rel. Emeterio v. Tokai Corp. | green | “unreasonably dangerous as designed, taking into consideration the utility of the product and the risk involved in its use.” | 7 |
| 5 | Science Spectrum, Inc. v. Martinez | green | “must itself expressly present the grounds upon which it is made, and must stand or fall on these grounds alone.” | 5 |
| 6 | Coastal Tankships, U.S.A., Inc. v. Anderson | green | “reasoning is sometimes correct, sometimes fallacious” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.