5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. Anchor | green | “extraordinary remedy, which should be granted only in limited circumstances.” | 21 |
| 2 | Aaron Hope v. Warden Pike County Corr | green | “consider the totality of the circumstances of confinement, including any genuine privations or hardship over an extended period of time, and whether conditions are (1) rationally related to their legitimate purpose or (2) excessive in relation to that purpose.” | 13 |
| 3 | Bennington Foods LLC v. St. Croix Renaissance Group, LLP | green | “reasonable probability of eventual success in the litigation.” | 11 |
| 4 | Maldonado v. Houstoun | green | “(1) he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) denial will result in irreparable harm; (3) granting the injunction will not result in irreparable harm to the defendants; and (4) granting the injunction is in the public interest.” | 10 |
| 5 | Duraco Products, Inc. v. Joy Plastic Enterprises, Ltd., D/B/A Backyard Products Travis Products, Inc | green | “the decision whether to enter a preliminary injunction is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.