4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Sherwood.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Sherwood Anchor | green | “f the relief sought is against others than the united states the suit as to them must be ignored as beyond the jurisdiction of the court.” | 24 |
| 2 | Etagz, Inc. v. Flambeau, Inc. | green | “no plaintiff, pro se or otherwise, may be excused from the burden of meeting the court's jurisdictional requirements.” | 16 |
| 3 | Kissi v. United States | green | “if the court of federal claims determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, it must dismiss the claim.” | 5 |
| 4 | Marcum LLP v. United States | green | “the court of federal claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.