4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Ketterer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Ketterer Anchor | green | “res judicata bars the assertion of claims against a valid, final judgment of conviction that have been raised or could have been raised on appeal.” | 24 |
| 2 | State v. Saxon | green | “promotes the principles of finality and judicial economy by preventing endless relitigation of an issue on which a defendant has already received a full and fair opportunity to be heard.” | 23 |
| 3 | State v. Ketterer | green | “bars the assertion of claims against a valid, final judgment of conviction that have been raised or could have been raised on appeal.” | 13 |
| 4 | State v. Rexroad, Unpublished Decision (11-24-2004) | green | “that a defendant failed to directly appeal from his conviction and sentence does not prevent the application of the doctrine of res judicata.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.