3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re JFC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re JFC Anchor | green | “disregarding undisputed facts that do not support the finding could skew the analysis of whether there is clear and convincing evidence.” | 24 |
| 2 | In Re CH | green | “a standard that focuses on whether a reasonable jury could form a firm conviction or belief retains the deference an appellate court must have for the factfinder's role.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.