9 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 62 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc. Anchor | green | “this court liberally construes the record in favor of the party opposing the motion for summary judgment and draws any reasonable inferences and conclusions in that party's favor.” | 15 |
| 2 | AED, Inc. v. KDC Investments, LLC | green | “this court exercises de novo review of a grant of summary judgment and the 'standard of review is the same as the standard used by the trial court in ruling on the motion for summary judgment.” | 10 |
| 3 | Houpt v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n | green | “if reasonable people could reach different conclusions or inferences from the evidence, summary judgment is inappropriate.” | 9 |
| 4 | Patricia Marek v. Hecla, Limited | green | “a genuine issue of material fact exists when the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.” | 8 |
| 5 | Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc. | green | “this court's review of a trial court's ruling on a motion for summary judgment is the same standard used by the trial court in originally ruling on the motion.” | 7 |
| 6 | Taylor v. Taylor | green | “summary judgment is appropriate 'if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 7 | Dominguez v. Evergreen Resources, Inc. | green | “if a worker is entitled to benefits, the operation of the exclusive remedy rule generally grants the industrial commission exclusive jurisdiction over the matter.” | 3 |
| 8 | Dominguez v. Evergreen Resources, Inc. | green | “permitted to collect worker's compensation benefits for which he is eligible and to bring a cause of action against his employer outside the worker's compensation system.” | 3 |
| 9 | Meyers v. City of Idaho Falls | green | “for the purpose of learning the intention, all statutes relating to the same subject are to be compared, and . . . brought into harmony by interpretation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.