5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 62 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Syed Saifuddin Yusuf v. Vassar College.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Syed Saifuddin Yusuf v. Vassar College Anchor | green | “asserts that, regardless of the student's guilt or innocence, the severity of the penalty and/or the decision to initiate the proceeding was affected by the student's gender.” | 15 |
| 2 | Syed Saifuddin Yusuf v. Vassar College | green | “statements by members of the disciplinary tribunal, statements by pertinent university officials, or patterns of decision-making that also tend to show the influence of gender.” | 15 |
| 3 | Syed Saifuddin Yusuf v. Vassar College | green | “particular circumstances suggesting that gender bias was a motivating factor behind the erroneous finding.” | 14 |
| 4 | John Doe v. Columbia University | green | “no person in the united states shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” | 12 |
| 5 | John Doe v. Columbia University | green | “because title ix prohibits (under covered circumstances) subjecting a person to discrimination on account of sex, it is understood to 'bar the imposition of university discipline where gender is a motivating factor in the decision to discipline.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.